grazing in desert
Environmental Issues

Cattle Grazing the Desert Will Not Solve Climate Change


“Severe grazing is absolutely essential to maintain biodiversity,” argues Allan Savory in a recent TED Talk. This is the opposite of scientific truth for the sensitive desert ecosystem. Advocating “holistic grazing,” Mr. Savory pieces together false assumptions to produce ineffective but popular recommendations on climate change.

grazing in desert ecosystem
According to Allan Savory, well-planned grazing promotes plant growth, and the action of animal hooves on the soil improves the soil’s absorption of water, thus preventing and reversing desertification, and helping to combat climate change. Science begs to differ. Photo: Oregon State University EESC

Allan Savory gives a popular and very misleading TED talk

By Ralph Maughan, Published in The Wildlife News

Allan Savory is a name not well known to most people concerned about climate change.  However, he has been preaching his gospel of holistic grazing for a generation now and is somewhat loved by the Western livestock grazing industry, but not by other scientists in the field. Read, Cows Against Climate Change: The Dodgy Science Behind the TED Talk.

Last month he brought his message to an audience at a TED (Technology, Entertainment and Design) talk. He was warmly received. He had changed his usual message a bit, now not only to justify livestock grazing on arid and semi-arid lands, but also as an important measure to capture carbon that is being lost to atmosphere and forcing climate change. You should listen, but be prepared in advance to question his assumptions and facts.

“The notion that bare, unvegetated soil in the American desert is an evil to be avoided flies in the face of everything we know about desert soil science. Sparsely vegetated [desert] soil is crucial for the survival of many animal species, including desert tortoises, fringe-toed and horned lizards, and other animals that actually belong in the desert far more than do cattle.” — Chris Clarke, KCET

Savory begins by speaking of the specter of “desertification,” which he says is the spread of bare ground into grasslands due to bad land use practices and also misconceived methods of restoring desertified lands — by removing livestock. Instead he advocates the use of more livestock and at high density, but only over relatively small parts of the affected land for brief periods of time. Then the livestock are to be moved to another part of the degraded land for a short time, and so on. As all of us should, Savory comes down hard on the unmanaged year-round grazing of indefinite numbers of livestock. The surprise is, he says, that even more livestock herded his way, will restore grasslands — bare ground will fill with grass. He produced some photos to show the change using his methods, all in Africa where he developed his ideas.

Savory’s narrative is compelling if you accept his idea that deserts are but rarely natural. For him ground that is bare, without grass, is desert and desert is not natural. However, deserts are indeed natural, and they are not simply bare ground areas.  Secondly, he believes that deserts and desertification are the same thing. They are not. In fact there is much dispute over the definition of desertification. Wikipedia says there are over a hundred definitions.

livestock, desert ecosystem, overgrazing
There are thriving, diverse arid-land ecosystems called “deserts,” home to some of the most staggering biodiversity and fascinating adaptations one could imagine. They’re very different from the places we humans have thrashed so completely that few things will grow there. Cows will not help. Photo: Ray Wheeler

Natural and Biodiverse, The Desert Ecosystem

Deserts are indeed natural. They have existed for millions of years before any human influence. They have their own ecosystems, and they, like grasslands, can be degraded by human activity and in a sense be “desertified,” if one insists on using that word. Lands that have sufficient rain to support grasslands can be and are desertified by irrigation followed by salinization (salting) of the soil, direct human disturbance, repeated burning beyond the natural rate, and especially livestock grazing beyond the area’s meager capacity, or by grazing animals that differ from those that naturally (originally) grazed the area.

The huge Sahara desert had soil just as dry and bare at the end of the Ice Age as it is today. Twice since then, changes in the monsoons (natural climate change) brought rains for a thousand or so years, but then 5 to 7-thousand years ago the rains receded and the desert returned. It changed from desert to grassland and back again apparently without human intervention or the presence or absence of livestock.

Today there is land degradation (desertification) around the edges of this greatest desert and much of it is human caused or aided. The same is true over almost all the planet’s deserts and their degraded margins.

The four deserts of North America are the Mojave, Great Basin, Sonoran, and Chihuahuan.  They all have some grasslands within their borders, especially the Great Basin and Chihuahuan Deserts. Savory believes that grasslands are maintained by “proper” grazing — grasses evolved along with grazing animals, and lack of grazing destroys the grasslands.

Large Mammals Did Not Evolve Grazing Deserts and their Biological Crusts

It’s likely the grasses did evolve with grazers, but Savory also believes the grazers of importance were always large mammals. Further, he believes that sheep, goats, and cattle (the latter a completely human produced animal) acceptably mimic the departed wild grazers. This is not true. Over millions of acres of North America deserts, bison, elk, javelina, and pronghorn never roamed, nor grazed the deserts or the patches of grassland within them. These deserts were and are grazed, but by small mammals like rabbits, mice, reptiles such as desert tortoise, and insects. Grasses that evolved being eaten by tortoises and rabbits are not likely to respond well to being eaten in intense, even if short termed, bouts of grazing by the artificially created cow, or Old World animals such as sheep, goats, or horses.

While deserts are characterized by some people to be only so much bare ground or moving sand, true desert is a complete and ancient ecosystem. Of course, moving sand, grit, salt or rocks do not store much carbon, but when the bare ground of North American deserts is not trampled, biological crusts form on top of almost all bare soil. In other words, they are not really bare. The crypto-biotic crusts hold the soil in place and sequester carbon. If you are caught in a desert dust storm, head not for the disturbed soil but for the areas with crusts for your own sake.

Desert ecosystem
Most of the desert surface is covered by biological soil crusts. The organisms that form them are nearly invisible except for brief periods when the soil surface is moist. They anchor soil from erosion and some fix atmospheric nitrogen, a limiting nutrient in most desert soils. From Ironwood National Monument in Arizona.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) writes: “Crusts generally cover all soil spaces not occupied by green plants. In many areas, they comprise over 70% of the living ground cover and are key in reducing erosion, increasing water retention, and increasing soil fertility. In most dry regions, these crusts are dominated by cyanobacteria (previously called blue-green algae), which are one of the oldest known life forms. Communities of soil crusts also include lichens, mosses, micro-fungi, bacteria, and green algae.”

However, Savory doesn’t like crusts. He even calls them “the cancers of desertification.” He thinks they suppress grass and that rain runs off of them, but it does not.

Every kind of desert develops its own assemblage of crusts. On ungrazed Great Basin desert near where I live (Pocatello, Idaho) every winter the crusts expand, grow, soak up moisture and nutrients, which are full of carbon. In the springtime, grasses and forbs grow right up through them, and they seemingly disappear to those who are not aware of their nature. These crusts are destroyed by trampling, but often come back after not too many years.

The crusts of the hotter and drier deserts are less resilient, and one footstep or cow print can destroy them for many years, even for more than a century. They retreat to live around the cholla, mesquite and thick creosote that livestock avoid.

The Livestock Recovery Fantasy of a Degraded Desert

While Savory shows some photos of lands that show little recovery even though livestock were removed (location not given), annual grasses can grow back quickly in some cases in hot desert.

desert ecosystem
“The language of “desertification” conflates the vibrant, healthy, exuberant, biologically diverse desert landscape with the bulldozed, trampled parking lot.” -Chris Clarke, with his photo of Joshua Tree in the Mojave Desert.

Unfortunately, in many places, especially the Great Basin Desert, recovery of degraded desert is complicated even more by the invasive cheatgrass, Bromus tectorum, from Eurasia. This annual grass grows very rapidly in early spring, ripening in late May or June. Then it is ready to burn. It greatly accelerates the Great Basin desert fire regime, destroying eventually all the shrubs and native grasses. The result is a cheatgrass monoculture that gives back all the carbon it drew from the ground and the air about every other year when it burns.

Cattle are able to eat the cheatgrass only briefly before it goes to seed. Grazing it does not even prevent it from setting more than ample seed. You can experiment with it yourself if you have some. Mow it, once or twice from when it begins to grow in early October and resumes growth in March. You will find its abundance undiminished next year. Unfortunately, removing cattle does not reduce the cheatgrass, but it might slow or stop its spread because the cattle are not eating and weakening the remaining native grasses in the area while they trample the cheat grass seeds into the ground and spread it to new places.

Conservationists, like many people, usually do not prefer the desert. They may see it as waste, fit only for bombing ranges and solar farms. The idea they can, like magic, green the desert and the degraded lands by running more livestock, sucking up greenhouse gas all the while, is a compelling and dangerous fantasy.

Degraded arid and semi-arid lands can sometimes be restored, especially if there are still native seeds in the soil and few invasives. Yet the current best we can probably do is to protect what we have and confine pastured livestock to the humid fertile, open areas where the grasses really do respond favorably to proper levels of grazing.

Arid places on the planet just do not produce that much biomass. However, they can slowly sequester large amounts of carbon. It is very important that their carbon storage not be squandered trying to produce livestock.

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. Pingback: Cowspiracy: Animal Agriculture Despoils Land, Water and Climate |


    We have here a professor of Political Science giving an opinion against an actual practitioner of land recovery . This is how politics corrupt progress.

  3. Circumstantial assertion yields facile conclusion. Read the article and respond to the points made. No corruption here other than people confusing what might be a solution to reinvigorating a degraded grassland ecosystem in Africa and applying it to actual arid climes and ecosystems. With all due respect, cattle ranching is the scourge of much of the lands in the Western US, and certainly not a solution to land health.

  4. Pingback: Soil and Nutrition: No-Till Organics and Carbon Sequestration |

  5. So… Grazers love alan savory for the information he provides, because they try it and it works? But a scientist who sits in a lab coat tricking numbers and not practicing agriculture think he’s wrong???

    Maybe decide what ‘misinformation’ really means. There are plenty of scientists, professionals, hands, ranchers and farmers who would strongly disagree.

    A desert is a desert because it has been baked to degredation by the sun, depletion and overgrazing, water stress, etc. If you manage these things properly, desertification can ABSOLUTELY be reversed.

    The problem is the conventional ideas have too much support without research and development of whole systems working together ecologically and symbiotically- that is what is perpetuating climate change.

    Go visit a farm that doesn’t use pesticides, irrigation, or support monocultures in the conventional system, or ranchers who practice rotational, mob, or hollistic grazing. You might get an idea of how we do it wrong, and allow “science” to spread real misinformation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.